Abstract
The article analyzes the approaches to the understanding of the state apparatus from the point of view of the efficiency of its functioning. The methodological basis of modern studies is the sociological theory of Max Weber, who high-lighted the attributive characteristics of the bureaucratic system as the most effective form of government. The evolution of his proposed ideas in the process of development of society in general and the state apparatus in particular is considered. Important aspects in the approaches to efficiency evaluation, which should be taken into account in practical application, are noted.References
Вебер М. Теория социальной и экономической организации. Нью-Йорк : Изд-во Оксфордского университета, 1947.
Мертон Р. Социальная теория и социальная структура. М. : ACT: ACT МОСКВА : ХРАНИТЕЛЬ, 2006. 873[7] с.
Burns T., Stalker G. M. The Management of Innovation. London, 1961.
Gouldner A. W. Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy Free Press of Glencoe, Glencoe, Ill, 1954.
Jarkasih A. The Influence of Bureaucracy Apparatus' Behaviour to Service Quality of Land Certificate (Study at the Land Office of Majalengka, West Java) // Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). 2021. Vol. 4, no. 2. P. 2286—2297.
Sarangi S., Slembrouck S. Language, bureaucracy and social control. Routledge, 2014.
Grunow D. Max Weber and the bureaucratic organization: a perpetual challenging concept // Max Weber 100 year death conference, Hangzhou.
Schluchter W. I. The paradox of rationalization: on the relation of ethics and world // Max Weber’s Vision of History. University of California Press, 1979. P. 11—64.
Catlaw T. J. Fabricating the people: Politics and administration in the biopolitical state. University of Alabama Press, 2007.
Hodson Randy, Teresa A. Sullivan. The social organization of work. Cengage Learning, 2012.
Томас Ш., Герт А. Старые понятия-новые проблемы: социология Макса Вебера в свете актуальных вызовов // Социологическое обозрение. 2017. Т. 16, № 2. С. 198—217.
Anthropology in the Margins of the State / V. Das et al. // PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review. 2004. Vol. 30, no. 1. P. 140—144.
Pedraja-Chaparro F., Salinas-Jiménez J., Smith P. C. Assessing public sector efficiency: Issues and methodologies // Available at SSRN 2018855. 2005.
Besley T. Principled agents?: The political economy of good government. Oxford University Press on Demand, 2006.
Потехин В. Н. Новое качество государственного управления в условиях перехода на инновационный способ развития общественного воспроизводства // Приоритетные направления инновационной деятельности в промышленности. 2020. С. 163—171.
Kang B. G. Frontier education production functions and the sources of public education inefficiency. State University of New York at Binghamton, 1998.
Letter grading government efficiency / A. Chong et al. // Journal of the European Economic Association. 2014. Vol. 12, no. 2. P. 277—298.
Bloom N., Sadun R., Van Reenen J. Do private equity owned firms have better management practices? // American Economic Review. 2015. Vol. 105, no. 5. P. 442—446.
Erkoc T. E. Bureaucracy and Efficiency // Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance / A. Farazmand ed. (Cham: Springer, 2017). 2017. P. 1—7.
Лаврова А. П. Технология выработки, принятия и реализации управленческих решений // Известия Международной академии аграрного образования. 2021. № 57. С. 118.
Государственное управление современным социально-экономическим развитием: мифы и реальность / И. В. Минакова и др. // Вестник Алтайской академии экономики и права. 2019. № 2. С. 124—129.
Машунин Ю. К., Машунин И. А. Исследование, прогнозирование развития экономики, промышленности и формирование бюджета государства в условиях цифровой экономики // Цифровизация экономических систем: теория и практика. 2020. С. 221—250.
Gibbons R., Henderson R. Relational contracts and organizational capabilities // Organization science. 2012. Vol. 23, no. 5. P. 1350—1364.
Shepsle K. A. Congress is a “they,” not an “it”: Legislative intent as oxymoron // International Review of Law and Economics. 1992. Vol. 12, no. 2. P. 239—256.
Williams M. Beyond state capacity: Bureaucratic performance, policy implementation and reform // Journal of Institutional Economics. 2021. No. 17(2). P. 339—357. doi:10.1017/S1744137420000478.
Mkandawire T. ‘State Capacity, History, Structure, and Political Contestation in Africa’ / in M. Centeno, A. Kohli, and D. Yashar (eds.), States in the Developing World. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017. P. 184—216.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Dudnikova V.A.